
The
philosopher Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), born in Amsterdam of Marrano
parents, was educated in Bible, Talmud, Jewish philosophy, and later
Latin and the natural sciences. The following is excerpted from his
Theological-Political Treatise, published anonymously in 1670.
Highly controversial, the Treatise argues that God cannot be known
through miracles but instead through rational thinking; the Treatise
also defends the liberty of every man to philosophize in the face
of religious or political interference. |
[A] miracle is an event of which the causes cannot be explained by the
natural reason through a reference to ascertained workings of nature;
but since miracles were wrought according to the understanding of the
masses, who are wholly ignorant of the workings of nature, it is certain
that the ancients took for a miracle whatever they could not explain by
the method adopted by the unlearned in such cases, namely, an appeal to
the memory, a recalling of something similar, which is ordinarily regarded
without wonder; for most people think they sufficiently understand a thing
when they have ceased to wonder at it. The ancients, then, and indeed
most men up to the present day, had no other criterion for a miracle;
hence we cannot doubt that many things are narrated in Scripture as miracles
of which the causes could easily be explained by reference to ascertained
workings of nature. . . .

The
tablets were God's work, and the writing was God's writing, incised
upon the tablets.
Exodus 32:16
|
We cannot gain knowledge
of the existence and providence of God by means of miracles, but we can
far better infer them from the fixed and immutable order of nature. By
miracle, I here mean an event which surpasses, or is thought to surpass,
human comprehension: for in so far as it is supposed to destroy or interrupt
the order of nature or her laws, it not only can give us no knowledge
of God, but, contrariwise, takes away that which we naturally have, and
makes us doubt God and everything else. . .
Scripture nowhere
states the doctrine openly, but it can readily be inferred from several
passages. Firstly, that in which Moses commands (Deut 8) that a false
prophet should be put to death, even though he work miracles; "If
there arise a prophet among you, and gives thee a sign or wonder, and
the sign or wonder come to pass, saying, Let us go after other gods .
. . thou shalt not hearken unto the voice of that prophet; for the Lord
your God proves you, and that prophet shall be put to death." From
this it clearly follows that miracles could be wrought even by false prophets;
and that, unless men are honestly endowed with the true knowledge and
love of God, they may be as easily led by miracles to follow false gods
as to follow the true God; for these words are added: "For the Lord
your God tempts you, that He may know whether you love Him with all your
heart and with all your mind."
Further, the Israelites
from all their miracles, were unable to form a sound conception of God
as their experience testified: for when they had persuaded themselves
that Moses had departed from among them, they petitioned Aaron to give
them visible gods; and the idea of God they had formed as the result of
all their miracles was a calf!
Nearly all the
prophets found it very hard to reconcile the order of nature and human
affairs with the conception they had formed of God's providence, whereas
philosophers who endeavor to understand things by clear conceptions of
them, rather than by miracles, have always found the task extremely easy
at least, such of them as place true happiness
solely in virtue and peace of mind, and who aim at obeying nature, rather
than being obeyed by her. Such persons rest assured that God directs nature
according to the requirements of universal laws, not according to the
requirements of the particular laws of human nature, and that, therefore,
God's scheme comprehends, not only the human race, but the whole of nature.
 |
From:
Spinoza, Baruch. A Theologico-Political Treatise. R. H.,
Elwis trans. Copyright © 1951 Dover Publications, Inc., pp.
84-88.
|
|